We have two suggestions on the table: 1) Rename RFCs to PCRs. (Perl Change Requests). 2) Add a Status: metainfo field. I don't want votes on them yet, I want to make sure they're viable and sensible changes. My thoughts: 1) I'm loathe to make unnecessary changes. RFCs are requests for comment. I understand the confusion between the Internet RFCs which are nominally standards, but these are Perl RFCs not Internet RFCs. Is this really such a big deal that we need to invalidate everything we've already written that mentions "RFC"? 2) Who is going to decide the status? I picture a working group chair saying "ok, time to nail this RFC down" and handing it off to a working group. When they return, is that the end of it? I don't want, and I guess nobody wants, indefinite ongoing blather about a topic. Comments? NatThread Next